Check what official records say about an existing ADU or secondary suite, how local authorities handle unpermitted work, and what inspections or certificates may still be needed.
About this topic & how to use these guides
An existing accessory dwelling unit (ADU), secondary suite, or other small secondary dwelling needs more than a plausible layout or a long history of use to establish its status. The relevant authority records, approved plans, completed inspections, current use, and later alterations all matter. This category helps you check those pieces and understand what a local correction or regularization route can—and cannot—establish.
Start with the property record
Begin with the exact municipal address or parcel and identify every authority that may have approved or inspected the unit. Compare the permit and inspection record with the physical unit: its location, number of dwellings, layout, construction date, services, and current use. A record can be genuine but cover a different scope or an earlier version of the property.
For a Toronto garage or ancillary-building conversion, the Toronto garden-suite guide explains why the structure’s permit history affects its treatment under current zoning.
Planning or zoning status, building and fire safety, utility approvals, permission to occupy, rental rules, title restrictions, and lender or insurer requirements may be separate questions. A certificate or inspection record proves only what its issuer, date, approved scope, and stated conditions cover. Start with possible corrective-work checks, then compare the specific documents in completion certificates and legal-status records.
A practical way to compare an existing accessory dwelling unit with the permits, approved plans, inspections, and use records held by the responsible authorities.
Learn how authorities may assess an accessory dwelling built without approval, what a retrospective route can require, and why applying does not guarantee legalization.
Understand the kinds of checks an authority may make when an existing secondary dwelling is legalized, without assuming a generic code checklist applies to every property.
Separate an authority notice and legal-status question from tenancy rights, occupancy approval, sale records, and private lending or insurance decisions.
Learn how to match historical records to a local construction, installation, conversion, or occupancy date test without treating age as proof of approval.
What Toronto's address-specific Property Information Report can show about permits, inspections, and orders—and what it does not decide about a secondary suite.
Follow a records search through the right authority, date range, archive, and access route, then separate an inconclusive search from a missing approval.
Understand how an England lawful development certificate differs from building-regulations regularization, and why neither document answers every approval or occupancy question.
Separate expired permits from never-permitted work, then check which Atlanta renewal or extension route may apply and what approval remains unfinished.
Toronto gives limited zoning relief to some permitted existing garages and ancillary buildings converted into garden suites. Unpermitted structures are treated as new buildings under current zoning, regardless of age.
Berkeley's pilot offers two different certificate paths for qualifying unpermitted ADUs and JADUs: a building-permit route to a Certificate of Occupancy or a Housing Certificate of Compliance.
New York City's Department of Buildings outlines a local path from deciding whether an illegal conversion can be legalized through permits, corrective work, final sign-off, and correction records.
New York City's Local Law 126 pilot covers some existing occupied basement and cellar apartments, but DOB is not currently accepting applications for temporary residence authorization.
Seattle identifies a construction permit to establish use as the route for legalizing an existing accessory dwelling unit; the permit record and approved scope still need to be checked for the property.
See what regulation 13 and a district council's regularisation certificate can establish, what checks may follow, and why planning permission remains separate.
San José asks for evidence that an unpermitted ADU predates 2020; if the City cannot establish the date, its FAQ points to the current-code permit path.
Marin County’s AB 2533 process includes an optional confidential pre-application inspection and a one-year completion window after applying for a permit.
Piedmont lists local building and fire items to check when legalizing an existing ADU, including egress, utilities, garage conversion and fire separation.
Mississauga requires existing second units to be registered and asks for an inspector-signed permit; an unpermitted unit must first enter the permit process.
Merton’s regularisation certificate covers the Building Regulations requirements it specifies at the time of the unauthorized work, not planning or current-condition status.